Recent update
- News - Obituary: Gamze Gunoral
- News - Robust economy raises Turkey’s hopes
- News - California joins insurance probe
- News - FSA arranging avian flu exercise
- News - Lloyd’s of London head chides FSA
- News - Yell shares make bright start
- News - Statoil boss declares war on corruption
- News - Financial circulars
- News - Co-op Insurance cuts 2,000 jobs
- News - US drug safety checks ’slack’
News - New warnings for store card users
février 29th, 2008 by missbad67
The measure is being imposed by the Competition Commission to help prevent store card holders being est finance financial hill in insurance international irwin management mcgraw real series
.
The commission found that the annual percentage rates (APRs) on store cards were too high.
As a result it calculated that store card users have been overcharged by at least 55m a year.
“Retailers and store card credit providers are, we have found, available car finance insurance quote
insulated from competitive pressures,” said commission deputy chairman Christopher Clarke.
“The consequence is that store cardholders who take up credit and associated insurance pay too much.”
More finance insurance tourist zurich
The watchdog’s home personal finance insurance into store cards was launched in March 2004 at the request of the Office of Fair Trading.
 |
 Excess prices paid for credit and insurance on store cards has been at least 55 million a year and possibly significantly more  Competition Commission
|
Last September, the commission, in a preliminary report, said consumers were being overcharged due to inflated interest rates.
It found a lack of competitive pressure on either the annual percentage rates (APRs) charged or the cost of associated insurance.
The commission now says store card credit providers must:
- where APRs are 25% or above, warn cardholders on monthly statements that cheaper credit may be available elsewhere.
- give more and better information on all monthly statements.
- offer the option to pay by direct debit.
- offer payment protection insurance separately from other elements of store card insurance.
The credit card industry, following a parliamentary Treasury Select Committee enquiry into UK debt, agreed to introduce similar warnings on statements in 2004.
The Finance & Leasing Association (FLA), the trade body for the card companies, welcomed most of the commission’s proposals.
But it said it was worried about highlighting charges in excess of 25% a year:
“At first sight, the APR warning notice appears to be an attractive, simple transparency measure. But we are concerned that it may really be a back door cap, harming vulnerable consumers.
“The remedy could harm the most vulnerable consumers, who would be rendered tourist insurance finance zurich
to serve by store card providers and whose alternative forms of credit are at higher APRs than on store cards” said the FLA.
Card users overcharged
Although the average APR being charged by store cards has come down slightly in the last year or two, the commission found that the card companies are charging interest at 10-20% above a level that would reflect the costs of providing the cards and generating a reasonable level of profit.
The result is that the average store card APR has been 26.5%.
The Commission estimates that by the end of 2006, 90% of store card accounts will still be charging interest of at least 25% a year.
It also discovered that the APRs charged on many store cards cluster around the 30% level.
By comparison nearly all credit cards - 95% of them - are cheaper, charging interest of 26% or less each year.
This has led to store card users being overcharged by at least 55m a year and “possibly significantly more”, the commission said.
Which? formerly known as the Consumers Association, said people should avoid store cards at all costs and choose a cheap-rate credit card instead:
“Given that the average credit card APR is 15 per cent, all those people with APRs between 15 per cent and 25 per cent are already borrowing at a very expensive rate and will have no warning that they could be borrowing more cheaply” said Which?
The market
The number of store card accounts in use has been declining and had dropped to 11.4 million by the end of 2005.
But with 70 different retailers offering them they are still an important source of credit for shoppers.
The commission does not accuse retailers of conspiring to cheat their customers.
Instead it points the finger at the way the whole market operates.
Among the features it highlights are that:
- store cards are often sold as a way of getting cheap offers on goods rather than on the basis of their APRs.
- customers are not sensitive to the APRs or late payment charges on store cards.
- customers do not understand the cost of buying insurance policies such as payment protection insurance which is often bundled into the cost of the card.
- card statements do not provide enough information about the charges being levied.
The commission believes that greater transparency would bring more competitive pressures into the supply of store cards, thus bringing charges down.
Posted in Finance insurance | | 0 Comments
News - Making sex pay
février 28th, 2008 by missbad67
| edition finance hill insurance international management mcgraw risk series p://autocompanyfinance.freeblogsite.com/news-financial-sector-see-jobs-growth-59/”>yahoo finance insurance auto sbc p://1035annuityexchange.propertyblogging.com/2008/02/25/news-insurance-firms-jobs-boost-2/”>banking career career finance in insurance opportunity opportunity slators are hoping to bring that to a close with a parliamentary bill that would draw prostitutes into the legal fold and bring the industry under state control, providing sex workers with labour rights and greater health protection.
The sex workers themselves would be expected to pay up when the tax man calls - boosting state coffers to the tune of an estimated 50 million euros a year.
In Thailand, for example - where both sex workers and some policy advisers have been pushing for legalisation and taxation - the sex industry is thought to account for at least several percent of the nation’s GDP. In Britain, it is estimated that some 770m ($1.2bn) is spent on prostitution every year, more than on cinemas or many other forms of entertainment. Those who can tap it, do. The US state of Nevada, where prostitution is legal, hopes to pick up millions of dollars over the next two years from houses of prostitution. But for most it remains untouchable capital, beyond the reach of politicians needing cash injections for ailing health services, welfare systems and other popular expenditures. Legalisation is often the only way to tap into this source of wealth while offering prostitutes better working conditions, a route both Germany and the Netherlands have embarked on in recent years. Prostitutes in Germany, believed to number around 400,000, have for the past year been able to take part in a scheme that offers social benefits like pensions, health insurance and a 40-hour week in sanitary conditions, in exchange for a slice of their earnings.
For their part, Dutch prostitutes have been asked to pay 19% VAT for similar rights since brothels were legalised nearly three years ago. Advocates of this kind of legislation believe it is the only way to make sure sex workers enjoy adequate health and employment protection. Opponents say it simply consolidates them in a position from which governments should be battling to remove them. Teething problems Finance ministries in both Germany and the Netherlands say it is impossible to calculate just how many prostitutes have registered to pay tax as forms do not ask them to name their profession. But anecdotal evidence from prostitutes’ organisations suggests that many have, where possible, at least tried to take up the offer. “It has, however, been very difficult,” says Marion Detlefs of the Hydra prostitute advice centre in Berlin. “When it was set up there was much talk of securing proper contracts, proper health insurance but a lot of this hasn’t materialised because of big holes in the legislation. “At the moment it looks like all the government cares about is getting their hands on sex workers’ money - women who are already hard-up are giving their earnings away and getting very little return.” Despite the problems of these fledgling laws, European groups lobbying for better conditions for prostitutes believe they are at least a step in the right direction. “But it has to be a matter of mutual benefit,” says Marieke van Doorninck of the Institute for Prostitution Issues. “Governments have to offer real labour rights and protection in exchange.” “It’s a slow process, but I do think it’s moving, and that the situation for prostitutes is improving. People’s attitudes are also starting to soften.” Ms van Doorninck says that while money provides one impetus for governments to legalise prostitution, the other issue is bringing the industry under state control to regulate its expansion. In the Netherlands, legalisation has not led to the expansion of the industry, as predicted by some, but in fact to the closure of a number of brothels which are unable to comply with the restrictions and the bureaucracy involved with gaining legal status. But under the Dutch law, only Dutch citizens and those from the European Union are allowed to work as prostitutes in brothels, which many believe will have pushed illegal migrant sex workers onto the streets. While their earnings may be safe from the tax man, neither they nor their cash enjoy much protection from underworld bosses. Should prostitution be legalised and governments use its revenue? Or should more be done to stamp the profession out? Your reaction Three words described legalized prostitution –”Opening Pandora’s Box”. I’ve got children who could eventually work in brothels and the streets if they cannot meet their financial needs in the future. Nothing can compare to the evil legalised prostitution will bring to your country and to the world at large. God Bless!)
We are speaking as those from developed countries where the choice of whether to work in the prostitution trade is often a lot easier. Would any mother or father really want their daughter to work in the trade? What about those forced into the trade and trafficked from the developing world? Women from countries in the EU do not want to work as prostitutes so the women have to be imported from countries where the economic situation is so bad the women have no choice. It is estimated that two thirds of those working in the brothels in the Netherlands are from outside the EU. Once again an example of a developed country exploiting the poverty and desperation of those in the developing world. But hey - Belgium will get richer out of the taxes so let’s concentrate on that! Having heard too many horror stories about the conditions of prostitute’s lives, I can’t help feeling that legalization and a strong support structure is vital - but perhaps in combination with a clampdown on illegal prostitution (ie pimps and clients, not persecution of prostitutes). Currently the half-tolerated but illegal position of prostitution benefits nobody except unscrupulous criminals.
Prostitution is a fact of life and is a service which if regulated would hurt nobody. At the moment, a blind eye is turned on massage parlours and conditions are poor. Admission of prostitution and incorporation of it into the service sector could improve conditions and free resources to move prostitutes from the streets which is a cause of concern for local communities and in view of the safety aspects of the girls. I went to Amsterdam recently on holiday with friends. To my surprise, the Red Light District is so damn well organised. More importantly, people are friendly (as you’d expect) and they all get on. The place is clean, people dont fight, and the girls are making more money than most people. Fact is, if people are willing to work as Prostitutes, let them but tax them and make it legal in certain places. Keep the area under constant monitoring and let the government make more money!!!!
Like drugs, gambling and pot noodle, prostitution is something that appeals to human instincts. It’ll happen regardless of whether it is legal or not. Legalising it should make it safer for all parties and take some of the seediness out of it.
Thou Shalt NOT commit Adultery. Agriculture is the oldest profession, not prostitution! Surely the safety of the girls should be the prevailing factor rather than the cash that could be generated. It is shocking that prostitutes are treated as 2nd class citizens because it upsets the principles of a few middle class bores. Prostitution is not an occupation which is chosen but is thrust upon someone who is vulnerable and has nowhere else to turn. These people need protection from the dangers they are exposed to from their clients and their ‘pimps’. Legalisation can only be a good thing to help get these girls off the streets.
As long as the woman or man voluntarily sells her or himself, then i don’t see why it should prohibited. What one wants to do with one’s own body is not the business of anyone else. However, if it becomes legally permissible, i definitely think that it should be taxed just like any other industry. The same applies to substances such as marijuana - let people decide to abuse their own bodies as they see fit. Yes! Legalise it and collect the revenue. Like the drug issue it will not go away no matter how stigmatised, criminalised or politicised it becomes. Tax an inevitable source of revenue and make conditions safer for all involved.
Prostitution is a sickness of society, opposes family values, increases abortion and is often the desperate act of drug addicts to obtain cash. It should never be legalised. If the government wants to tap money from this market then they should impose huge fines on prostitutes, to stop the crime paying. Whatever our opinions of the profession, it will not go away. America tried to do away with alcohol during the prohibition period and it proved to be impossible. So if it can’t be stopped governments might as well make the best of it. Prostitution is exploitation of women by criminals. Their clients are pathetic. Your description of this activity as a “profession” is a disgrace. I recommend you view the film Lilya-4-ever, a look at the day to day realities of prostitutes. Making prostitution legal would benefit the whole community. You will no longer have red light districts on housing estates as areas could be designated by the police. This should help many areas which are affected by the constant cat and mouse game between the police and prostitutes. The health benefits would lead to a decline in the rate of sexual disease, as by having regular testing the disease should be treated much earlier. The prostitutes themselves would be able to work in a much safer environment leading to less assault and a lower crime rate against them.
Stamping our prostitution is like stamping out sex… will never happen. So governments who realise this say to themselves “If we can’t eliminate it, then we must take advantage of it and cash in.” Money is not the root of all evil… weak men are. I am originally from New Zealand and prostitution has finally been decriminalised there recently. Prior to this there was quite a percentage of prostitutes paying tax on their earnings anyway and the government seemed to have no qualms using the revenue. Prostitution should be decriminalised. All this amounts to is the governments acting as pimps and providing protection for their ’staff’ in return for a slice of their wages.
Yes it should be legalised, but not with the aim of simply collecting more tax revenue. One of the greatest scandals of our age is the trafficking of women to be abused as sex objects. Anything that can make it tougher for criminals to enforce their brutal exploitation of these helpless victims has to be welcomed. Well, several hundred years of trying to extinguish prostitution didn’t help. I’m strongly in favour of legalisation as it would help in health and social issues. The additional benefit is that legal brothels would help in preventing trafficking as someone with a legal business would be less willing take a risk with illegal activities. Until three years ago prostitution was illegal, but accepted. The police could keep an eye on the situation (investigate criminals that forced young Eastern European girls into prostitution) and local government could develop a policy concerning prostitution (locate it in certain parts of town etc). Now it is legal, the position of legal prostitutes has improved a little. But the illegal prostitutes are much worse off. They are not visible anymore and more easily the victim of criminal groups that are active in prostitution. The aim of the legalisation was to protect prostitutes. In my opinion it has failed. Yes it should be legalised. The government could make a huge amount of money from the industry and it would provide safer surroundings for those who work in the industry. It will always exist in every society. Therefore, the mature and responsible course of action is to bring it within the government sphere of influence. This will make it safer for both parties involved and allow the government to take a piece of the pie. The taxes could be used for schools and the NHS.
|
Posted in Finance insurance | | 0 Comments
News - Banks ‘must tackle online fraud’
février 27th, 2008 by missbad67
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) made the call as it revealed half of internet users are either extremely or very concerned about the risk of fraud.
To ease safety fears banks should make more effort to educate web users about online security, the FSA said.
But it warned if customers were forced to foot the bill for online fraud 77% would stop banking via the web.
More than 1,500 people were quizzed about online banking for the FSA’s Financial Risk 2006 report.
The study, which will be published on Wednesday, also showed that while many web users were protecting themselves, almost a quarter did not know when they last updated their security software.
Security breaches
“Most consumers recognise they have some responsibility for security but they are not necessarily following this obligation through,” FSA financial crime sector leader Philip Robinson said.
|
Banks need to look carefully at consumer attitudes Philip Robinson, FSA
|
“To tackle the losses associated with fraud, banks should continue to drive security and this must include educating consumers on the importance of protecting themselves.”
It added that figures from industry body Apacs showed internet fraud losses rose to 14.5m in the first six months of 2005.
While admitting that the figure was “automotive finance insurance low” the FSA did point out that the figure had more than trebled from the 4m lost in the same period a year earlier.
In an effort to curb the growing problem of online fraud banks are testing new security tools.
Lloyds TSB began trials of a new two-part security system last year to tackle scams where fraudsters hack people’s PCs or use “phishing” emails to steal login details.
Online safety
Around 30,000 customers were sent a finance and insurance training
security device which generates a six-digit code - which changes every 30 seconds - to be used alongside usernames and passwords.
“We recognise that many banks are already taking steps to engage consumers,” Mr Robinson added.
“Initiatives like the ‘Get Safe Online’ campaign between the government and the private sector show consumer education is beginning to happen.
“But banks need to look carefully at consumer attitudes and whether their 1035 annuity exchange finance insurance ira transfer are effective in estate finance fundamentals hill in insurance investment irwin management mcgraw real series confidence.”
Online fraud has also hit the headlines recently after reports that criminal gangs had stolen millions from the government through tax credit scams involving the Department for Work and Pensions and Network Rail.
Such frauds are carried out by criminals who steal an individual’s name, date of birth and National Insurance number and use these personal details to steal money from the government by making finance gambling insurance internet pharmacy
tax credit claims.
Posted in Finance insurance | | 0 Comments
News - Black empowerment ‘needs review’
février 26th, 2008 by missbad67
| South Africa’s programme to open ownership of the country’s firms to black investors needs to be reviewed, finance minister Trevor Manuel says.
|
Posted in Finance insurance | | 0 Comments
News - Making sex pay
février 25th, 2008 by missbad67
p://blog.kilasan.com/estfinance/2008/02/14/news-swiss-re-to-buy-ge-insurance-firm/”>finance household insurance
p://financeinsuranceyaho.edgereport.com/2007/11/30/news-banking-giant-to-create-375-jobs/”>finance insurance jobp://financeandinsurance.nurseblogging.com/2007/12/30/news-uk-financial-exports-hit-record/”>banking career career finance in insurance opportunity opportunity//blog.kilasan.com/1035annuityexchange/2007/11/22/news-foreign-investment-in-japan-soars/”>finance or insurance or real estatelators are hoping to bring that to a close with a parliamentary bill that would draw prostitutes into the legal fold and bring the industry under state control, providing sex workers with labour rights and greater health protection.
But for a fee.
The sex workers themselves would be expected to pay up when the tax man calls - boosting state coffers to the tune of an estimated 50 million euros a year.
The fact is, sex is a good source of revenue, as the underworld has long known. The industry is incredibly lucrative, given the consistent nature of demand for the services of the world’s oldest profession.
|
 At the moment it looks like all the government cares about is getting their hands on sex workers’ money
Marion Detlefs
Hydra, Berlin |
In Thailand, for example - where both sex workers and some policy advisers have been pushing for legalisation and taxation - the sex industry is thought to account for at least several percent of the nation’s GDP.
In Britain, it is estimated that some 770m ($1.2bn) is spent on prostitution every year, more than on cinemas or many other forms of entertainment.
Those who can tap it, do. The US state of Nevada, where prostitution is legal, hopes to pick up millions of dollars over the next two years from houses of prostitution.
But for most it remains untouchable capital, beyond the reach of politicians needing cash injections for ailing health services, welfare systems and other popular expenditures.
Legalisation is often the only way to tap into this source of wealth while offering prostitutes better working conditions, a route both Germany and the Netherlands have embarked on in recent years.
Prostitutes in Germany, believed to number around 400,000, have for the past year been able to take part in a scheme that offers social benefits like pensions, health insurance and a 40-hour week in sanitary conditions, in exchange for a slice of their earnings.
|
It’s a slow process, but I do think it’s moving, and that the situation for prostitutes is improving
Marieke van Doorninck
Institute for Prostitution Issues |
For their part, Dutch prostitutes have been asked to pay 19% VAT for similar rights since brothels were legalised nearly three years ago.
Advocates of this kind of legislation believe it is the only way to make sure sex workers enjoy adequate health and employment protection.
Opponents say it simply consolidates them in a position from which governments should be battling to remove them.
Teething problems
Finance ministries in both Germany and the Netherlands say it is impossible to calculate just how many prostitutes have registered to pay tax as forms do not ask them to name their profession.
But anecdotal evidence from prostitutes’ organisations suggests that many have, where possible, at least tried to take up the offer.
“It has, however, been very difficult,” says Marion Detlefs of the Hydra prostitute advice centre in Berlin. “When it was set up there was much talk of securing proper contracts, proper health insurance but a lot of this hasn’t materialised because of big holes in the legislation.
“At the moment it looks like all the government cares about is getting their hands on sex workers’ money - women who are already hard-up are giving their earnings away and getting very little return.”
Despite the problems of these fledgling laws, European groups lobbying for better conditions for prostitutes believe they are at least a step in the right direction.
“But it has to be a matter of mutual benefit,” says Marieke van Doorninck of the Institute for Prostitution Issues. “Governments have to offer real labour rights and protection in exchange.”
“It’s a slow process, but I do think it’s moving, and that the situation for prostitutes is improving. People’s attitudes are also starting to soften.”
Ms van Doorninck says that while money provides one impetus for governments to legalise prostitution, the other issue is bringing the industry under state control to regulate its expansion.
In the Netherlands, legalisation has not led to the expansion of the industry, as predicted by some, but in fact to the closure of a number of brothels which are unable to comply with the restrictions and the bureaucracy involved with gaining legal status.
But under the Dutch law, only Dutch citizens and those from the European Union are allowed to work as prostitutes in brothels, which many believe will have pushed illegal migrant sex workers onto the streets.
While their earnings may be safe from the tax man, neither they nor their cash enjoy much protection from underworld bosses.
Should prostitution be legalised and governments use its revenue? Or should more be done to stamp the profession out?
Your reaction
Three words described legalized prostitution –”Opening Pandora’s Box”. I’ve got children who could eventually work in brothels and the streets if they cannot meet their financial needs in the future. Nothing can compare to the evil legalised prostitution will bring to your country and to the world at large. God Bless!)
Jozcat, Phils.
|
It is estimated that two thirds of those working in the brothels in the Netherlands are from outside the EU
Anna, UK
|
We are speaking as those from developed countries where the choice of whether to work in the prostitution trade is often a lot easier. Would any mother or father really want their daughter to work in the trade? What about those forced into the trade and trafficked from the developing world? Women from countries in the EU do not want to work as prostitutes so the women have to be imported from countries where the economic situation is so bad the women have no choice. It is estimated that two thirds of those working in the brothels in the Netherlands are from outside the EU. Once again an example of a developed country exploiting the poverty and desperation of those in the developing world. But hey - Belgium will get richer out of the taxes so let’s concentrate on that!
Anna, UK
Having heard too many horror stories about the conditions of prostitute’s lives, I can’t help feeling that legalization and a strong support structure is vital - but perhaps in combination with a clampdown on illegal prostitution (ie pimps and clients, not persecution of prostitutes). Currently the half-tolerated but illegal position of prostitution benefits nobody except unscrupulous criminals.
Paul, Czech Rep
Prostitution is a fact of life and is a service which if regulated would hurt nobody. At the moment, a blind eye is turned on massage parlours and conditions are poor. Admission of prostitution and incorporation of it into the service sector could improve conditions and free resources to move prostitutes from the streets which is a cause of concern for local communities and in view of the safety aspects of the girls.
Phillip, UK
I went to Amsterdam recently on holiday with friends. To my surprise, the Red Light District is so damn well organised. More importantly, people are friendly (as you’d expect) and they all get on. The place is clean, people dont fight, and the girls are making more money than most people. Fact is, if people are willing to work as Prostitutes, let them but tax them and make it legal in certain places. Keep the area under constant monitoring and let the government make more money!!!!
Fais,
England
|
Like drugs, gambling and pot noodle, prostitution is something that appeals to human instincts
Gavin, Wales
|
Like drugs, gambling and pot noodle, prostitution is something that appeals to human instincts. It’ll happen regardless of whether it is legal or not. Legalising it should make it safer for all parties and take some of the seediness out of it.
Gavin, Wales
Thou Shalt NOT commit Adultery.
Its SIN to commit Adultery.
God will punish those who commit Adultery and those who legalised Adultery.
Gurkha Rai, Sydney, Australia
Agriculture is the oldest profession, not prostitution!
Alec Weir,
UK
Surely the safety of the girls should be the prevailing factor rather than the cash that could be generated. It is shocking that prostitutes are treated as 2nd class citizens because it upsets the principles of a few middle class bores. Prostitution is not an occupation which is chosen but is thrust upon someone who is vulnerable and has nowhere else to turn. These people need protection from the dangers they are exposed to from their clients and their ‘pimps’. Legalisation can only be a good thing to help get these girls off the streets.
Chris, UK
As long as the woman or man voluntarily sells her or himself, then i don’t see why it should prohibited. What one wants to do with one’s own body is not the business of anyone else. However, if it becomes legally permissible, i definitely think that it should be taxed just like any other industry. The same applies to substances such as marijuana - let people decide to abuse their own bodies as they see fit.
Hannah, USA
Yes! Legalise it and collect the revenue. Like the drug issue it will not go away no matter how stigmatised, criminalised or politicised it becomes. Tax an inevitable source of revenue and make conditions safer for all involved.
Nik,
England
|
They should impose huge fines on prostitutes to stop the crime paying
Giles Johnson, UK
|
Prostitution is a sickness of society, opposes family values, increases abortion and is often the desperate act of drug addicts to obtain cash. It should never be legalised. If the government wants to tap money from this market then they should impose huge fines on prostitutes, to stop the crime paying.
Giles Johnson, UK
Whatever our opinions of the profession, it will not go away. America tried to do away with alcohol during the prohibition period and it proved to be impossible. So if it can’t be stopped governments might as well make the best of it.
John R, UK
Prostitution is exploitation of women by criminals. Their clients are pathetic. Your description of this activity as a “profession” is a disgrace. I recommend you view the film Lilya-4-ever, a look at the day to day realities of prostitutes.
Emmet Fahy, Ireland
Making prostitution legal would benefit the whole community. You will no longer have red light districts on housing estates as areas could be designated by the police. This should help many areas which are affected by the constant cat and mouse game between the police and prostitutes. The health benefits would lead to a decline in the rate of sexual disease, as by having regular testing the disease should be treated much earlier. The prostitutes themselves would be able to work in a much safer environment leading to less assault and a lower crime rate against them.
Guy Willoughby, UK
|
‘We must take advantage of it and cash in’
James,
Canada |
Stamping our prostitution is like stamping out sex… will never happen. So governments who realise this say to themselves “If we can’t eliminate it, then we must take advantage of it and cash in.” Money is not the root of all evil… weak men are.
James,
Canada
I am originally from New Zealand and prostitution has finally been decriminalised there recently. Prior to this there was quite a percentage of prostitutes paying tax on their earnings anyway and the government seemed to have no qualms using the revenue. Prostitution should be decriminalised.
Elle, UK
All this amounts to is the governments acting as pimps and providing protection for their ’staff’ in return for a slice of their wages.
Simon, Edinburgh, UK
|
One of the greatest scandals of our age is trafficking women to be abused as sex objects
Anthony,
Germany (UK) |
Yes it should be legalised, but not with the aim of simply collecting more tax revenue. One of the greatest scandals of our age is the trafficking of women to be abused as sex objects. Anything that can make it tougher for criminals to enforce their brutal exploitation of these helpless victims has to be welcomed.
Anthony,
Germany (UK)
Well, several hundred years of trying to extinguish prostitution didn’t help. I’m strongly in favour of legalisation as it would help in health and social issues. The additional benefit is that legal brothels would help in preventing trafficking as someone with a legal business would be less willing take a risk with illegal activities.
Vladan Konstantinovic, Serbia & Montenegro
Until three years ago prostitution was illegal, but accepted. The police could keep an eye on the situation (investigate criminals that forced young Eastern European girls into prostitution) and local government could develop a policy concerning prostitution (locate it in certain parts of town etc). Now it is legal, the position of legal prostitutes has improved a little. But the illegal prostitutes are much worse off. They are not visible anymore and more easily the victim of criminal groups that are active in prostitution. The aim of the legalisation was to protect prostitutes. In my opinion it has failed.
Nanne de Jong,
Netherlands
Yes it should be legalised. The government could make a huge amount of money from the industry and it would provide safer surroundings for those who work in the industry.
TDD, UK
It will always exist in every society. Therefore, the mature and responsible course of action is to bring it within the government sphere of influence. This will make it safer for both parties involved and allow the government to take a piece of the pie. The taxes could be used for schools and the NHS.
Nick,
UK
Posted in Finance insurance | | 0 Comments
News - Insurance firm’s jobs boost
février 24th, 2008 by missbad67
American Life is part of the American International Group - one of the 10 largest insurance finance and investment by turnover in the world.
It currently employs 25 people at its headquarters in Belfast.
The company’s offices were opened on Monday by Cathy Hurst public affairs attache from the American Est finance financial hill in insurance international irwin management mcgraw real series General.
The firm said it wanted to recruit a sales force of consultants.
Belfast Branch Manager Patrick O’Donnell said: “We’re looking to build a total sales force of 500 across Ireland, with around 150 consultants in Northern Ireland.
“A number of other insurance and financial services providers have shut down their sales force and stopped face-to-face meetings with customers over recent years.
“But American Life has built its corporate est finance finance hill in insurance irwin mcgraw real series
and business on the local community approach - selling financial solutions to real people - and that is what we are intending to do here in Northern Ireland.”
Enterprise Minister Ian Pearson said he was delighted by the American Life move.
“They are one of the most asset company derivative finance from in insurance insurance liability management underwriting wiley
insurance companies worldwide,” he said.
“Their arrival in Northern Ireland is a positive approach estate estate finance hill in insurance irwin mcgraw principle real real series value
of the strength of the local economy.”
Posted in Finance insurance | | 0 Comments
News - Banks ‘must tackle online fraud’
février 23rd, 2008 by missbad67
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) made the call as it revealed half of internet users are either extremely or very concerned about the risk of fraud.
To ease safety fears banks should make more effort to educate web users about online security, the FSA said.
But it warned if customers were forced to foot the bill for online fraud 77% would stop banking via the web.
More than 1,500 people were quizzed about online banking for the FSA’s Financial Risk 2006 report.
The study, which will be published on Wednesday, also showed that while many web users were protecting themselves, almost a quarter did not know when they last updated their security software.
Security breaches
“Most consumers recognise they have some essential estate finance hill in insurance investment irwin mcgraw real series
for security but they are not necessarily following this event extremal finance insurance modeling through,” FSA financial crime sector leader Philip Robinson said.
|
Banks need to look carefully at consumer attitudes Philip Robinson, FSA
|
“To tackle the losses 1035 annuity exchange finance insurance ira transfer with fraud, banks should continue to drive security and this must include educating consumers on the importance of protecting themselves.”
It added that figures from industry body Apacs showed internet fraud losses rose to 14.5m in the first six months of 2005.
While admitting that the figure was “relatively low” the FSA did point out that the figure had more than trebled from the 4m lost in the same period a year earlier.
In an effort to curb the growing problem of online fraud banks are testing new security tools.
Lloyds TSB began trials of a new two-part security system last year to tackle scams where fraudsters hack people’s PCs or use “phishing” emails to steal login details.
Online safety
Around 30,000 customers were sent a auto car finance insurance rate
security device which generates a six-digit code - which changes every 30 seconds - to be used alongside usernames and passwords.
“We recognise that many banks are already taking steps to engage consumers,” Mr Robinson added.
“Initiatives like the ‘Get Safe Online’ campaign between the government and the private sector show consumer education is beginning to happen.
“But banks need to look carefully at consumer attitudes and whether their initiatives are effective in maintaining confidence.”
Online fraud has also hit the headlines recently after reports that criminal gangs had stolen millions from the government through tax credit scams involving the Department for Work and Pensions and Network Rail.
Such frauds are carried out by criminals who steal an case est finance finance hill in in insurance irwin mcgraw real series
name, date of birth and National Insurance number and use these personal details to steal money from the government by making fraudulent tax credit claims.
Posted in Finance insurance | | 0 Comments
News - Black empowerment ‘needs review’
février 22nd, 2008 by missbad67
| South Africa’s programme to open ownership of the country’s firms to black investors needs to be reviewed, finance minister Trevor Manuel says.
|
Posted in Finance insurance | | 0 Comments
News - How will ISA changes affect you?
février 21st, 2008 by missbad67
| The Treasury has announced that the amount that people will be allowed to save tax-free is to fall. An expert explains the changes and what strategy people should adopt. When Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs) were introduced by Gordon Brown in 1999 the amount that could be paid in was set at 7,000. At the end of the first year the Treasury said that the tax-free savings allowance would fall to 5,000. However, the Chancellor later decided to extend the period that the 7,000 limit would continue until April 2006. In the recently published pre-budget report the Treasury reiterated that the limit would revert to 5,000 in 2006.
But under the government proposals - to be opened up to consultation with the finance industry - how the money can be invested in an ISA is to be simplified. Current limits Under current rules, a maxi ISA allows investors to put up to 7,000 into shares, but it can also be broken down to allow up to 3,000 to go into cash savings and 1,000 into insurance. A mini ISA enables investors to split up their money into three separate cash, share and insurance ISAs. The limits are 3,000 in cash, 3,000 in shares and 1,000 in insurance. Under the new rules there will only be two elements to a mini ISA - 1,000 maximum in cash and 4,000 into stocks and shares. The insurance mini ISA - which hasn’t proved popular - is being scrapped. As for Maxi ISAs, people can use their full tax-free allowance of 5,000 to invest in either stocks or shares, medium-term stakeholder products, life insurance or collective investments.
The reduction of the amount that can be invested into a mini cash ISA will be a blow for many savers. Many people who have paid into a mini cash ISAs may not have dreamed of investing in Personal Equity Plan (PEP) - the predecessor of ISAs. What is more, the essential est finance hill in insurance investment irwin mcgraw real series of mini cash ISAs came at just the right time, as savings accounts have finance or insurance or real estate Strategy
It is really important to use the higher allowance while you still can. It is imperative that any savings that are languishing in taxpaying accounts are transferred into a mini cash ISA - if you have not yet used your ISA allowance for this tax year. As for the stocks and shares ISA allowance, there is a major health warning. You should never use the stocks and shares ISA allowance just for the sake of it. Stock market investment can be risky and it has to be right for you. But there are ways of keeping a lid on risk. Collective investments such as unit trusts or investment trusts pool investor cash in order to buy a basket of different company shares. The views expressed are solely those of Ms Bowes and are for general information only. They do not constitute financial advice as defined by the Financial Services and Markets Act and are not intended to be relied on for the purposes of making an investment decision. Always obtain art capital finance finance insurance managing risk structured wiley advice from a qualified, registered financial adviser before making any investment decisions.
|
Posted in Finance insurance | | 0 Comments
News - Pension crisis: Will anyone fix it?
février 20th, 2008 by missbad67
|
How the UK tackles the impending pension crisis is now a major topic of discussion. But will anyone have the guts to fix it in 2005? In the first of a two-part series, Joanne Segars, representing insurance firms, outlines the industry’s priorities for the New Year. 2004 was a year in which pensions and savings were higher on the public agenda than ever before. As we begin the New Year, it’s important this continues: Britain faces a 27bn annual savings gap, and closing it needs to be a national priority. But it is not helped by the following trends:
So the savings gap is getting larger, not smaller and without concerted action, the situation will get still worse.
Some progress was made in 2004: the Pensions and Finance Acts have introduced some insurance agent finance career change
For example, the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) will provide some new protection for members of private sector defined benefit schemes, where the employer is insolvent and the scheme is business finance insurance More importantly, it may help to restore confidence in occupational pensions. One in four people say the PPF will help increase their trust in pensions, according to ABI research. And we have seen bold moves to combine nine pensions tax regimes into one, meaning that for the vast majority of people, tax will not be a factor when it comes to saving in a pension. There’s a lot of work to be done to implement these changes for 2006 and the industry is working very hard because we recognise that the ultimate prize of a simple tax regime is one worth working for.
But by themselves, these changes will not be enough to close the savings gap by anything like enough. That’s why for the ABI, the highlight of the pensions scene in 2004 was the Pensions Association of finance and insurance professional first report. Quite rightly it says we cannot simply keep “muddling through” with sticking-plaster solutions to our pension problems. We also agree with the Commission’s conclusion that there are no easy answers and that without sustainable long-term fixes we will face a very serious pensions’ crisis in 15 or so years’ time. The Commission’s second report, which we hope will contain some proposals for radical policy changes, will also dominate the pensions landscape this year. Year of big changes So, 2005 could be a year of big changes. Whether that will be a revitalisation of voluntarism, or a move to full-scale compulsion remains to be seen. But the insurance industry believes that there is scope to make the voluntary system work better, and in a way that means more retirement savings for more people. So if we were granted three New Year’s wishes to get the voluntary pensions system working again, what would they be? State pension reform: The Government has rightly done much to help today’s poorest pensioners. But the current complex mix of state pension benefits doesn’t work for tomorrow’s pensioners. It sends mixed messages to consumers who simply do not know whether it is in their best interests to save. So the need for state pension reform is urgent and the message must be simple: it pays to save. We want to see a bigger second state pension that would reward the lowest earners combined with incentives to encourage those who can save to do so. Employers’ role: Put employers at the centre of pension provision. Like the Employer Task Force, the ABI believes that pensions work best when there is active employer engagement. We know that a modest employer contribution results in a dramatic increase in scheme membership. But we also recognise making contributions is not easy, especially for small employers. That is why we’ve proposed a Pension Contribution Tax Credit (PCTC) - a fiscal incentive for employers to contribute towards employees’ pensions. Our research shows that employers would respond well to such an incentive. Encourage savings: It is essential that the government and industry work together not just to raise awareness of the importance of saving for retirement but also to highlight the risks of not saving. The ABI recommends that the government and the FSA should provide clear information, showing both the benefits of saving and the risks of not saving. Next week, the Trades Union Congress (TUC) outlines views on how the UK should tackle the pensions crisis.
|
Posted in Finance insurance | | 0 Comments
« Previous EntriesCategories
- Business insurance (10)
- Credit insurance (4)
- Finance insurance (114)
- Financial loss insurance (2)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Workers compensation insurance (1)
Archives
Blogroll